Evaluation of the Push-Out Bond Strength and Penetration of Guttaflow bioseal, Endoseal MTA and Guttaflow 2 versus AH-Plus Root Canal Sealers into the Dentinal Tubules in Mandibular Premolar Teeth (A Randomized in vitro comparative study)
The aim of this study was to compare between Guttaflow Bioseal, Endoseal MTA, Guttaflow 2 and AH-Plus root canal sealers regarding the Push-Out Bond Strength and Sealer Penetration into the Dentinal Tubules Eighty extracted mandibular premolars with single canals were instrumented using M-Pro dental file system, irrigated with NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Obturation was done using a single cone technique and 4 different obturation sealing material. Then samples were randomly divided into 4 groups according to each sealer used: Group (I) Guttaflow Bioseal, Group (II) Endoseal MTA, Group (III) Guttaflow 2 and Group (IV) AH-Plus. Forty specimens were embedded in resin blocks and horizontally sectioned into approximately 2-mm-thick slices from the apical, middle, and coronal thirds for the Push out bond strength test. The value of the push-out bond strength was then determined. The remaining forty roots were obturated with 0.1% Rhodamine B labelled sealers to compare the dentinal tubule penetration. Ten teeth each had one horizontal slice taken from the apical root segment at a depth of 5 mm, which was then scanned using a confocal laser scanning electron microscope. Depth, area, and percentage of tubule penetration were measured. ANOVA test and a Tukey post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. In the apical, middle and coronal thirds, AH-Plus showed significantly higher push out bond strength. Endoseal MTA showed significantly higher maximum depth of penetration, followed by AH-Plus, which showed significantly higher maximum depth of penetration than Guttaflow Bioseal and Guttaflow 2 with no significant difference between them.
Eissa, M., Boghdadi, R., & Bedier, M. (2024). Evaluation of the Push-Out Bond Strength and Penetration of Guttaflow bioseal, Endoseal MTA and Guttaflow 2 versus AH-Plus Root Canal Sealers into the Dentinal Tubules in Mandibular Premolar Teeth (A Randomized in vitro comparative study). Advanced Dental Journal, 6(1), 181-192. doi: 10.21608/adjc.2023.191652.1251
MLA
Mariam Hesham Eissa; Randa Boghdadi; Marwa Bedier. "Evaluation of the Push-Out Bond Strength and Penetration of Guttaflow bioseal, Endoseal MTA and Guttaflow 2 versus AH-Plus Root Canal Sealers into the Dentinal Tubules in Mandibular Premolar Teeth (A Randomized in vitro comparative study)", Advanced Dental Journal, 6, 1, 2024, 181-192. doi: 10.21608/adjc.2023.191652.1251
HARVARD
Eissa, M., Boghdadi, R., Bedier, M. (2024). 'Evaluation of the Push-Out Bond Strength and Penetration of Guttaflow bioseal, Endoseal MTA and Guttaflow 2 versus AH-Plus Root Canal Sealers into the Dentinal Tubules in Mandibular Premolar Teeth (A Randomized in vitro comparative study)', Advanced Dental Journal, 6(1), pp. 181-192. doi: 10.21608/adjc.2023.191652.1251
VANCOUVER
Eissa, M., Boghdadi, R., Bedier, M. Evaluation of the Push-Out Bond Strength and Penetration of Guttaflow bioseal, Endoseal MTA and Guttaflow 2 versus AH-Plus Root Canal Sealers into the Dentinal Tubules in Mandibular Premolar Teeth (A Randomized in vitro comparative study). Advanced Dental Journal, 2024; 6(1): 181-192. doi: 10.21608/adjc.2023.191652.1251
)
View on SCiNiTO