Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
2 Faculty of Economic and Political Sciences, Cairo University, Egypt.
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
Introduction
For the last two years COVID-19 has been an ongoing pandemic that has led to worldwide anxiety and panic and has resulted in multiple lengthy quarantine periods. This outburst resulted in mass quarantine in Egypt in March 2020 (Garda world 2020). The quarantine resulted in suspending face to face classes in many universities worldwide. which - consequently - led to negative psychological effects among college students (Wang and Zhao, 2000)
Brooks et al., 2019 stated that quarantine could lead to “posttraumatic stress symptoms, anger, and misperception. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, fear of infection, insufficient supplies, frustration, lack of clear information, economic problems, and stigma.”.
Behavior and attitudes of oral hygiene practice are correlated with oral health status and could be considered as its predictors (Wardle and Steptoe, 1991).
Potential relationship was claimed to be between increased oral bacterial load and occurrence of COVID-19 infection complications (Levin and Shenkman, 2004). Bacteria in the metagenome of severely infected COVID-19 patients included high reads for Fusobacterium, and Prevotella, Staphylococcus, which are commensal oral flora (Sampson ,2020). Also, successful treatment of those cases has been achieved with a dual regime of an antiviral and an antibiotic (Gautret et al., 2020). Therefore, we suggest that maintaining good oral hygiene during COVID-19 outbreak reduces oral bacterial load, diminishing bacterial superinfection risk in case of catching the infection (Liu et al., 2020). Although, it is assumed that there is an effect of stress on oral hygiene practice, this hypothesis has not often been studied (Ghulam, 2018).
Dental students - as future health care providers- are expected to uphold, good oral hygiene practice. Thus, they were the perfect subjects to study how the level of anxiety during a pandemic could affect the practice of oral hygiene. We intended to investigate the association between the level of anxiety and the practice of oral hygiene during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.
Subjects and Methods
Study design
This is across sectional study (survey) conducted among dental students at the Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University from June 2020 to July 2020. The online survey was used to reach the students. The questionnaires were sent by email to all students from first year level through fifth year level. We used the students’ official mail to increase the expected response rate.
A pilot survey was conducted prior to the actual, large-scale survey to determine the appropriateness of the questions. The pre-test questionnaires were sent by email to a small sample of dental students. Feedback and comments of the students were considered and incorporated into the final version. The study was registered on clinical trial.gov No. (NCT04460469).
Participants
All students attending the Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University were included. The questionnaire was disseminated as Google form link to their official emails.
Ethical consideration
Ethical approval on the study protocol was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University (No.23 6 20). Submission of the questionnaire by the student was considered as consent to participate in this research.
The instrument of data gathering and variables measured:
The questionnaire has three parts (supplementary). The first part included demographic details. The second part included validated general anxiety disorder scale GAD-7(Spitzer et al., 2006). This scale consists of seven questions which measures students’ anxiety level score. The responses of all seven items were added up to produce the total anxiety score, Scale results of 0-4, 5-9, 10-14 and 15-21 indicate minimal, mild, moderate and severe anxiety respectively. The resulting variables that were included in the statistical analysis were the anxiety score and the anxiety index for which 5, 10, and 15 were used as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively.
The third part had 15 validated self-administered, structured, close-ended questions that assessed the self-reported oral hygiene practices (Naveenkumar et al., 2019). The questionnaire was assessed for validity and reliability by examining the internal consistency of the items included using Cronbach’s alpha measure. The questionnaire forms were kept anonymous.
Discontinuation of study/subject withdrawal
The study participants are free to withdraw from the study at any time by discontinuing completion of the survey. Their choice to withdraw did not affect their grades or evaluation.
Statistical Analysis
The data was computerized and analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version 20). Descriptive statistics including frequency tables, graphs, and cross tabulations were computed. Also, Comparisons concerning the oral hygiene practices and self-assessment of oral health were done between different academic years using Chi-square test. The level of significance was set at P<0.05.
To determine if there is any statistical relationship between anxiety of the students during the period of COVID-19 and their oral hygiene practices, Chi square test along with other statistical measures such as gamma measure were used. Also, the relationship between anxiety score and self-assessment of oral health during the period of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown was investigated. Moreover, Welch`s test was used to test the mean differences of anxiety score among different academic years. Games-Howell test was used in case of having significant differences to make pairwise comparisons. Also, one sample t-test was computed to test the mean difference of anxiety scores with respect to gender.
Results
A total of 2142 surveys were dispatched, however we received only 750 replies. Table (1) identifies the number of respondents by each academic year and gender as well. The response rate was similar for all academic years, giving an overall response rate of 35%.
Table (1): Number of returned questionnaires according to the academic year and gender
Academic Year |
Total questionnaires sent |
Total questionnaires returned |
Response rate (%) |
||
Female |
Male |
Total |
|||
First |
750 |
114 |
112 |
226 |
30.13% |
Second |
450 |
119 |
49 |
168 |
37.3% |
Third |
335 |
83 |
44 |
127 |
37.9% |
Fourth |
254 |
68 |
33 |
101 |
39.76% |
Fifth |
353 |
95 |
33 |
128 |
36.26% |
Total |
2142 |
479 |
271 |
750 |
35% |
1-Investigation of GAD score and anxiety categories
The total anxiety score ranged from 0 to 21 with a mean and SD of 8.84 ± 4.9. The mean anxiety score among first year students was 7.23 and for second year 8.04, while it was almost the same among third and fourth year students (9.39 and 9.3 respectively). Fifth year students have had the highest mean anxiety score (11.8). The mean score of fifth year students was significantly higher than the mean scores of all other groups (p < 0.05). Also, there are significant differences between first year students and each of fourth and fifth year students. Additionally, the mean anxiety score was found to be statistically higher in females than males p < 0.05. First year students had the highest minimal (9.1%), mild (12%) and moderate (6.5%) anxiety scores, while fifth year students were at the top of the leaderboard for severe anxiety (Table 2).
Table (2): Anxiety index according to the academic year level
|
Academic year |
Total |
||||||
First year |
Second year |
Third year |
Fourth year |
Fifth year |
||||
Anxiety Index |
Minimal anxiety |
Count |
68 |
33 |
20 |
20 |
2 |
143 |
% of Total |
9.1% |
4.4% |
2.7% |
2.7% |
0.3% |
19.1% |
||
Mild anxiety |
Count |
90 |
81 |
48 |
33 |
55 |
307 |
|
% of Total |
12.0% |
10.8% |
6.4% |
4.4% |
7.3% |
40.9% |
||
Moderate anxiety |
Count |
49 |
38 |
39 |
34 |
28 |
188 |
|
% of Total |
6.5% |
5.1% |
5.2% |
4.5% |
3.7% |
25.1% |
||
Severe anxiety |
Count |
19 |
16 |
20 |
14 |
43 |
112 |
|
% of Total |
2.5% |
2.1% |
2.7% |
1.9% |
5.7% |
14.9% |
||
Total |
Count |
226 |
168 |
127 |
101 |
128 |
750 |
|
% of Total |
30.1% |
22.4% |
16.9% |
13.5% |
17.1% |
100.0% |
2-Oral hygiene practice assessment:
The responses of the students concerning their oral hygiene practices are displayed in table (3). It shows that the majority of the students (94.8%) use both tooth brush and tooth paste. 4.7% of the students used the electric toothbrushes, most of whom were first year students.
Concerning the tooth brushing technique, the circular method was reported by 33.1% of the students followed by the vertical movements (20.7%). Additionally, half the study population was in the habit of flossing. Regular mouthwash users were mostly first year students; they were also the most to report bleeding on brushing and bad breath.
self-assessment of overall mouth cleanliness and oral health show that the majority of the students rated the cleanliness of their mouth following their routine tooth brushing regime to be good. Moreover, the majority were satisfied about their overall dental health during the period of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown (Table 3).
Table (3): Oral hygiene practices among dental students of Cairo University during the period of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown
|
Academic year |
|||||
1st year |
2nd year |
3rd year |
4th year |
5th year |
||
Count |
Count |
Count |
Count |
Count |
||
Oral hygiene aids used |
Both tooth brush and tooth paste. |
199 |
159 |
126 |
101 |
126 |
Tooth brush |
21 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
Tooth paste |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Type of toothbrush used |
Electric |
16 |
7 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
Manual |
210 |
161 |
120 |
99 |
125 |
|
Frequency of tooth brushing/day |
> Twice |
24 |
22 |
14 |
9 |
24 |
Once |
84 |
54 |
60 |
23 |
38 |
|
Twice |
118 |
92 |
53 |
69 |
66 |
|
Toothbrush bristles |
Extra-soft |
15 |
4 |
4 |
11 |
12 |
Hard |
7 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Medium |
134 |
88 |
82 |
34 |
36 |
|
Soft |
70 |
70 |
39 |
55 |
79 |
|
Tooth brushing technique |
Bass method |
12 |
5 |
0 |
26 |
28 |
Charters method |
2 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
|
Circular method |
66 |
62 |
64 |
35 |
21 |
|
I don't know |
79 |
37 |
19 |
2 |
1 |
|
Scrubbing |
11 |
8 |
10 |
3 |
7 |
|
Stillman`s method |
8 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
50 |
|
Vertical movements |
48 |
50 |
33 |
9 |
15 |
|
Duration of tooth brushing |
>1 min |
78 |
39 |
36 |
43 |
42 |
1 min |
105 |
102 |
56 |
45 |
63 |
|
30 s |
43 |
27 |
35 |
13 |
23 |
|
Time of tooth brushing |
Morning before breakfast and night after dinner |
131 |
97 |
51 |
65 |
79 |
Only once post breakfast |
20 |
7 |
10 |
2 |
4 |
|
Only once post dinner |
28 |
31 |
28 |
10 |
20 |
|
Other |
47 |
33 |
38 |
24 |
25 |
|
Inter-dental cleaning devices used |
Dental floss |
71 |
66 |
62 |
67 |
102 |
Inter-dental brush |
88 |
47 |
35 |
12 |
5 |
|
More than one device |
40 |
23 |
13 |
11 |
12 |
|
Tooth picks |
27 |
32 |
17 |
11 |
9 |
|
Fluoridated paste used |
I don`t know |
114 |
34 |
13 |
4 |
6 |
No |
36 |
26 |
17 |
9 |
21 |
|
Yes |
76 |
108 |
97 |
88 |
101 |
|
Use of mouthwash |
No |
99 |
102 |
88 |
62 |
82 |
Yes |
127 |
66 |
39 |
39 |
46 |
|
How often do you use a mouth wash |
Intermittently. |
61 |
42 |
27 |
34 |
38 |
Rarely. |
105 |
106 |
98 |
65 |
82 |
|
Regularly. |
60 |
20 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
|
Do you experience bleeding during tooth brushing |
Maybe |
83 |
46 |
40 |
28 |
29 |
No |
73 |
75 |
59 |
57 |
85 |
|
Yes |
70 |
47 |
28 |
16 |
14 |
|
Do you experience bad breath
|
Maybe |
66 |
48 |
38 |
20 |
31 |
No |
130 |
97 |
72 |
71 |
77 |
|
Yes |
30 |
23 |
17 |
10 |
20 |
|
Rate the cleanliness of your mouth, following your routine tooth brushing regime |
Fair |
66 |
33 |
40 |
28 |
32 |
Good |
146 |
126 |
71 |
67 |
90 |
|
Poor |
14 |
9 |
16 |
6 |
6 |
|
Rate your overall dental health during the period of Covid-19 pandemic |
Fair |
67 |
46 |
46 |
36 |
45 |
Good |
145 |
109 |
68 |
61 |
76 |
|
Poor |
14 |
13 |
13 |
4 |
7 |
3-Relationships between oral hygiene practices and anxiety during the period of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown:
Regarding the relationship between anxiety and self-assessment of oral health during the period of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, it was found that there is a significant weak inverse relation between them (Gamma -0.144, P -value 0.018); such that, among those who reported the cleanliness of their mouth following their routine tooth brushing regime to be good, most of them have minimal or mild anxiety. While, most of those who reported it to be poor have moderate and severe anxiety. Also, there is a significant inverse moderate relation between anxiety and rating the overall dental health during the period of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown (Gamma -0.34, P -value 0.000). Such that among those who were satisfied about their overall dental health during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, most of them have minimal and mild anxiety (table 4).
In general, we can discover that anxiety may have an effect on self-assessment of dental health of the students during the period of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.
Table (4): The relationship between anxiety level and self-assessment of the cleanliness of the mouth and dental oral health during the period of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.
|
Anxiety Index |
Chi square (p-value) |
Association measure (p-value)
|
||||
Minimal anxiety |
Mild anxiety |
Moderate anxiety |
Severe anxiety |
|
|
||
Rate the cleanliness of your mouth, following your routine tooth brushing regime |
Poor |
9.8% |
29.4% |
33.3% |
27.5% |
15.241 (.018*) |
Gamma= -0.144 (0.010*) |
Fair |
20.6% |
36.7% |
25.6% |
17.1% |
|||
Good |
19.4%
|
43.8% |
24.0% |
12.8% |
|||
Rate your overall dental health during the period of Covid-19 pandemic |
Poor |
15.7% |
25.5% |
23.5% |
35.3% |
32.041 (.000*) |
Gamma= -0.345 (0.000*) |
Fair |
15.4% |
37.1% |
29.2% |
18.3% |
|||
Good |
21.4% |
44.7% |
23.1% |
10.9% |
*P-value < 0.05
Discussion
Oral health reflects the level of an individual’s self-care and their general health status (Shiva et al., 2017). The COVID-19 pandemic has so far lead to a variety of psychological consequences such as anxiety, depression, change in personal routine and overall behavior (Liu et al., 2020).
Dental students in general have been found to have a positive oral health attitude (Umsan et al., 2007; Dagli et al., 2008). Thus, this study aimed to investigate whether COVID-19 lockdown lead to an increase in the level of anxiety of a sample of dental students and the subsequent effect on their oral hygiene practices.
We found that the majority of our sample suffered from mild anxiety, with most of them being in preclinical academic years (first through third years), while only a small portion suffered from severe anxiety, the majority of which were fifth year students. Agius et al., 2021offered a possible explanation to such a finding, citing fear of losing their manual dexterity skills, anxiety related to its consequences on their long-term plans, and anxiety related to the examinations as the main stressors for these students. This is made more plausible as at the time of dispatching this survey, the ministry of higher education had announced that senior year students will be sitting their final exams, while other undergrad years were to be evaluated by graduation projects (Egypt independent 2020). Additionally, these students had spent less time in clinical training than their counterparts in the previous years.
In accordance with our results, Lingawi and Afifi2020 who investigated the effect of anxiety on changes in social habits in dental students reported that most of the students suffered from mild anxiety, while a few of them suffered from moderate to severe anxiety. Similarly, lesser percentages of moderate (2.7%) to severe anxiety (0.9%) were detected in a sample of Chinese medical students during the pandemic (Cao et al., 2020).
On the other hand, in a study done in the United Arab Emirates on university students, it was found that 25% of the study population had severe anxiety based on the GAD-7 scale. This difference may be due to the way the survey was conducted, Seddik’s at al.,2020 survey was interview based during the clinical setting while ours was self-administered during the lockdown.
A higher percentage of females suffered from anxiety in our results is consistent with finding of lingawi & affifi, 2020and Saddik et al.,2020 we can clarify these finding by the higher number of females participating in the study 64.9 % of the sample in addition to the postulation that “females are more prone to get emotional and neurotic problems because of their metacognitive beliefs and thought control strategies” (Muhammad and Rajan 2020).
Concerning the self-assessment of oral health status, the majority of the students were satisfied with their overall dental health and cleanliness of their mouth during the period of Covid-19 pandemic, however, there was a statistically significant difference in self-assessment of level of overall oral health status between different academic years, where the clinical students in fourth and fifth years were the least to report poor oral health.
This finding is in accordance with reports by several studies (Shabeer et al.,2015; Mekhemar et al., 2021; Yildiz and Dogan, 2011) that revealed that the level of self-reported oral health status of clinical students was better than the preclinical students. This reflects the level of oral health awareness of students during the clinical years of their study.
Up to our knowledge, our study is the first to discuss the relation between the stress and oral hygiene practice and self-reported oral health status and cleanliness of the mouth during pandemic lockdown. We found a significant inverse relation between the level of anxiety and self- rating of oral health and hygiene in general where most of the students reported mild anxiety level and overall good oral hygiene and oral health. However, we also observed that groups with sever anxiety (fifth year students) were the least to report poor oral health, which as explained before proves the elevated level of awareness due to their academic advancement (Shabeer et al.,2015). The present study has some limitations, such as being conducted on a single dental school; however, it is the biggest faculty of dentistry in Egypt in which the students come from most of Egypt cities. Also, we evaluated the stress and oral hygiene practice during the pandemic, without prior reference about the study group before the pandemic.
The non-responding bias may have impact on the final results as the study was conducting during lockdown and we did not have the chance to contact the students by other means only the e-mail.
In addition, COVID-19-related stressors need to be investigated to identify how to minimize their effects on the students and on their social habits.
Conclusion and Clinical significance
Our study outlined the inverse relation between stress level and the practice of oral hygiene during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Most of the students suffered from mild stress, and reported good oral hygiene practice also, most of them rated their oral health and mouth cleanliness to be good especially clinical students (fourth and fifth year).It is important to design awareness programs to encourage the population to maintain good oral hygiene, especially in the pandemic situation when the stress and anxiety level increase in general as we found that the increase in awareness may mitigate the effect of stress on the practice of oral hygiene.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.