Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Pediatric dentistry and Dental Public Health department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University ,Cairo, Egypt.
2 Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University ,Cairo , Egypt.
3 Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department , Faculty of Dentistry , Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
Introduction
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by an obstruction of the airflow1. Asthma is a significant public health issue with global variations in incidence and severity2. The aim of asthma treatment is to reduce symptoms while maintaining normal lung function and preventing permanent changes in the airways3.
Long-term treatment is needed for children with chronic medical conditions. As a result, they are at an increased risk of dental diseases in general, and dental caries in particular4.This increased risk of caries is either a result of their disease or as a side-effect of their drugs. Some authors suggest that children with asthma showed lower salivary flow rate and pH than healthy one5. Tooth demineralization is worsened by a low salivary pH. Reduced salivary flow rate was found to be linked to lower salivary pH as well6.
In Children, consuming sweetened drugs causes plenty of oral health problems7.The amount of sucrose in the drug, its acidity, and the person's salivary flow rate and buffering efficiency are all variables to consider when assessing the drug's cariogenicity8.
Subjects and Methods
The study consists of clinical part and Invitro part for analysis of some drugs used in treatment of asthma.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03877874
Ethical approval
The Research Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt, granted ethical approval. Code number (19-6-6).
Clinical part:
The study design was a Retrospective Cohort study. The sample size calculation was approved by Medical Biostatistics Unit (MBU) at Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University. The sample was (60) child i.e. (30) for each group. Group (A); Asthmatic group selected from Abu El-Reesh Japanese Hospital for Children's Asthma and Allergy Outpatient Clinic. Group(B);Asthmatic-free control group picked from the Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department of Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
Inclusion criteria:
-Egyptian children aged 6-12 years old previously diagnosed with Bronchial asthma , taking regular medications for the treatment of asthma for at least 1 year back and didn’t have any other systemic diseases to be included in group(A) .
-A matched group of healthy asthmatic-free Egyptian children to be included in group(B).
1-Questionnaire items:
A questionnaire chart was used to record the personal data, parameters of the asthmatic medications (Duration, Dose, and Frequency of Drug Administration), snacking habits (Type, Frequency of consumption), frequency of tooth brushing, the use of mouth wash and flossing.
For recording the snacking habits and its potential cariogenicity, we used a scoring system designed by9. The diet's cariogenic potential was determined as follows:
2-Dental Examination:
All Children were examined clinically for dental caries by using dental mirrors and dental explorer no.23 under daylight conditions with the aid of light cure fiber optic transillumination (WOODPECKER,RTA Light Cure (1000-1200 watt),China). Dental caries surface index was measured using DMFs/defs index. Caries was evaluated according to WHO guidelines1987; a tooth was classified as carious whether it had a softened floor, undermined enamel, or softened wall, caries around any restoration, or a tooth with a temporary restoration.
3-Salivary Examination:
To assess the salivary pH, a saliva sample was taken. 1–2 hours after breakfast, a resting saliva sample was taken. The child was asked to sit motionless in an upright position and lean his head slightly forward, as per the guidelines of collecting the saliva 10. The child was instructed to spit into a plastic cup. This process was repeated until a volume of 3-5ml was obtained. A digital pH electrode meter was used to determine the salivary pH. (ATC, Pen Type pH Meter- pH-009 (I) A,Guangdong,China).
Invitro part:
The oral drugs used by those asthmatic children were(Apidone and Aironyl). These drugs are oral syrups used for long periods. These drugs were tested for their pH and Total sugar content. The drug’s pH was measured using a digital pH electrode meter. A glass beaker containing 20 mL of each drug was put in a water bath set at 37°C. A glass electrode was dipped into the syrup, and the pH was shown on the meter's panel. Each sample was checked three times in order to obtain a mean value 11.For measuring the total sugar content of drug ,The Fehling method was used12. The following equation was used to determine the sugar percentage:
Total sugars[%]= FEQ x dilution x 100 / (V TITRATION)
Where, FEQ-equivalence factor
V TITRATION-titration volume required
Statistical analysis:
Categorical data were expressed as frequencies (n) and percentages (%) and were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Quantitative data were tested for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Parametric data of age were represented as mean and standard deviation values and were analyzed using independent t-test. Ordinal data were expressed as interpolated median and interquartile range values and were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallistest followed by pairwise comparisons utilizing Dunn’s post hoc test. The significance level was set at p≤ 0.05 for all tests. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® (SPSS Inc., IBM Corporation, NY,USA)Statistics Version 26 for Windows.
Results
The study was conducted on 60 children (30 asthmatics, 30 asthmatic-free controls). (70.0%) of the asthmatics were males (30.0%) were females with mean age of (7.70±1.84). The control group consisted of (60.0%) males and (40.0%) females with mean age of (7.17±1.37) years. There was no significant difference in sex and age between both groups (p=0.598and p=0.208) respectively.
Table(1)showed the Frequencies(n) and percentages(%) of asthma drugs parameters; type, form, dose, duration of intake and frequency of administration.
Table (2)showed the snacking cariogenic potential intake and oral hygiene habits of each group. There was a significant difference between both groups regarding snacking cariogenic potential (p=0.024).While, There was no significant difference regarding oral hygiene habits(p=0.538).
Table(3)showed the Interpolated median and interquartile range (IQR) values of (defs/ DMFs and salivary pH) scores for both groups. The findings revealed that there was a significant difference between both groups regarding defs and salivary pH(p<0.001).While, There was no significant difference between both groups regarding DMFs(p=0.260).
Table(4) showed theInterpolated median and interquartile range (IQR) values of (defs, DMFs and salivary pH )scores for different parameters of the drugs(dose, frequency of administration and duration of administration).
Regarding the dose of the drug, the findings revealed that there was a significant difference between values of different doses and defs and DMFs (p=0.040),(p=0.002) respectively. While, There was no significant difference between values of different doses and salivary pH (p=0.720).
Regarding frequency of administration, There was a significant difference between different drug intake frequency and defs, DMFs and salivary pH (p=0.002),(p=0.023)and (p=0.002) respectively.
Regarding drug duration intake, There was no significant difference between different durations of drug intake and defs, DMFs and salivary pH (p=0.057),(p=0.135) and(p=0.607) respectively.
Invirto part; the results shows that both drugs(Apidone and Aironyl) are acidic where their pH values are 5.3and 5.1 respectively. While the total sugar content of Apidone is higher than that of Aironyl as the values are 17g%and0 .5g% respectively.
Table (1):Frequencies (n) and percentages (%) of bronchial asthma drugs parameters
Parameter |
Asthmatic |
p-value |
||
Drug type |
Bronchodilator and Corticosteroids |
n(%) |
30(100%) |
ـــــــــ |
Drug form |
Inhalation and oral |
n(%) |
30(100%) |
ـــــــــ |
Drug dose |
2.5 ml/ 2 puffs |
n(%) |
17A (56.7%) |
0.014* |
3 ml/ 3 puffs |
n(%) |
4B (13.3%) |
||
5 ml/ 3 puffs |
n(%) |
9AB(30.0%) |
||
Duration of drug intake |
1-2years |
n(%) |
2B(6.7%) |
<0.001* |
3-5 years |
n(%) |
21A (70.0%) |
||
≥ 6 years |
n(%) |
7B (23.3%) |
||
Frequency of drug intake |
Twice/day |
n(%) |
5B (16.7%) |
0.002* |
3 times/day |
n(%) |
19A (63.3%) |
||
4 times/day |
n(%) |
6B (20.0%) |
Different superscript letters indicate a statistically significant difference within the same vertical column and parameter*; significant (p ≤ 0.05), ns; non-significant (p>0.05)
Table( 2): Frequencies (n) and percentages (%) of snack cariogenic potential intake and oral hygiene habits of each group
Parameter |
Asthmatic |
Control |
p-value |
||
Snack-cariogenic potential intake |
No |
n(%) |
4A (13.3%) |
0B (0.0%) |
0.024* |
Low |
n(%) |
19A(63.3%) |
15A (50.0%) |
||
Moderate |
n(%) |
7A ( 23.3%) |
15B(50.0%) |
||
High |
n(%) |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
||
Frequency of teeth brushing |
None |
n(%) |
23(76.7%) |
19(63.3%) |
0.538ns |
Once/day |
n(%) |
2(6.7%) |
3(10.0%) |
||
Twice/day |
n(%) |
1(3.3%) |
0(0.0%) |
||
Once/week |
n(%) |
3(10.0%) |
6(20.0%) |
||
Twice/week |
n(%) |
1(3.3%) |
0(0.0%) |
||
3 times/week |
n(%) |
0(0.0%) |
1(3.3%) |
||
Once/month |
n(%) |
0(0.0%) |
1(3.3%) |
||
Flossing |
No |
n(%) |
30(100%) |
30(100%) |
|
Yes |
n(%) |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
||
Mouthwash usage |
No |
n(%) |
30(100%) |
30(100%) |
|
Yes |
n(%) |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
Different superscript letters indicate a statistically significant difference within the same vertical column *; significant (p ≤ 0.05) ns; non-significant (p>0.05)
Table (3): Interpolated median and interquartile range (IQR) values for (defs ,DMFs and salivary pH )for both groups
Score |
Interpolated median(IQR) |
p-value |
|
Asthmatic |
Control |
||
defs |
22.50(20.25) |
15.00(7.75) |
<0.001* |
DMFs |
2.00(5.50) |
1.60(1.00) |
0.260ns |
Salivary pH |
6.00(0.55) |
6.90(0.00) |
<0.001* |
Different superscript letters indicate a statistically significant difference within the same horizontal row*; significant (p ≤ 0.05) ns; non-significant (p>0.05)
Table (4): TheInterpolated median and interquartile range (IQR) values of (defs, DMFs and salivary pH) scores for different parameters of the drugs( dose, frequency of administration and duration of drug intake).
Parameter |
Dose of the Drug
|
|
|
Frequency of administration
|
|
Duration of Drug intake
|
|
|||||||
Score |
Interpolated median (IQR) |
p-value |
Interpolated median (IQR) |
p-value |
Interpolated median (IQR) |
p-value |
||||||||
2.5 ml/2 puffs |
3 ml/3 puffs |
5 ml/3 puffs |
Twice/day |
3 times/day |
4 time/day |
1-2years |
3-5 years |
≥ 6 years |
||||||
defs |
34.00 (27.00)A |
24.00 (7.00)AB |
19.75 (6.00)B |
0.040* |
20.67 (5.00)B |
21.00 (15.00)B |
50.00 (6.50)A |
0.002* |
38.50 (17.50)A |
27.00 (24.00) |
19.75 (8.00)A |
0.057 |
||
DMFs |
0.75 (2.00)B |
4.50 (7.75)AB |
6.00 (4.00)A |
0.002* |
2.33 (2.00)AB |
3.67 (6.50)A |
0.25 (0.75)B |
0.023* |
1.50 (0.50)A |
1.62 (4.00)A |
4.25 (4.50)A |
0.135 |
||
Salivary pH |
6.00 (0.50)A |
6.00 (0.15)A |
6.00 (0.60)A |
0.720 |
6.45 (0.20)A |
6.00 (0.30)AB |
5.75 (0.10)B |
0.002* |
6.20 (0.50)A |
5.88 (0.40)A |
6.25 (0.60)A |
0.607 |
Different superscript letters indicate a statistically significant difference within the same horizontal row*; significant (p ≤ 0.05) ns; non-significant (p>0.05)
Discussion
Bronchial asthma is a critical threat that affects millions of people. Several studies have been conducted to understand the effect of asthma and its medications on oral health.
The results of this study revealed that the asthmatic group had a significantly higher value of (defs) than the control group(p<0.001). While, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding DMFs(p=0.260). These results are in agreements with4 ,13 ,14 ,15.While,16,17 ,18 found that there was no correlation between asthma and caries. This controversy may be due the difference in the medication(types, dose, frequency, and duration),water fluoridation, lifestyle, snacking habits and oral hygiene habits.
Regarding the drugs frequency, the results showed that there was a significant difference between drug frequency and DMFs (p=0.023) and defs(p=0.002). This comes in accordance with19,20 ,21, 4. This result could be attributed to many reasons. Firstly; Frequent use of conventional sugar-containing medications raises the risk of caries due to the simple carbohydrates and the low endogenous pH of these drugs 22.Secondly; If doses are administered too close together, they remain in contact with the tooth
cavity to rise, raising the dental caries risk23. Thirdly; Drugs given in the evening, when there is a drop in salivary flow as well as decreased swallowing reflexes and muscle activity, stay in the oral cavity longer24.
Regarding the drugs doses, There was a significant difference between different doses and DMFs (p=0. 002) and defs(p=0.040).However, The highest value of( defs) was found with 2.5 ml/2 puffs while the lowest value was found with 5 ml/3 puffs . So, increasing the dose of the drugs isn’t a risk factor in increasing the caries experience. This comes in accordance with25,26while27,28 found positive correlation between drug doses and caries index.
Regarding the drugs intake duration, there was no significant difference between different drug intake durations and DMFs (p=0.135) and defs. (p=0.057).) This comes in accordance with29 ,20,30, 25,26.On the other hand, 31foundpositive linkage between duration of asthma and the caries indices.
Regarding the salivary pH, the results revealed that the asthmatic group had a significantly lower value of salivary pH than the control group(p<0.001).There was a significant difference between different drug intake frequency and the salivary pH(p=0.002)as the lowest value was found with 4 times/day while the highest value was found with twice/day which is in accordance with32,33,34 ,35, while,14didn’t find any significance difference between asthmatics and control group regarding the salivary pH. This result could be attributed to many reasons. Firstly, the use of β2 adrenoceptor agonists results in a reduction in salivary secretion .This reduction in salivary secretion is associated with a reduction in salivary pH36 .Secondly;13found that combining inhaled b2-agonists with glucocorticoids leading to changes in salivary composition and decrease in salivary pH .
But, there was no significant difference between salivary pH and drug doses or drug intake duration while 37found a negative relationship between the duration of drug intake and the salivary pH. They noticed that as the duration of drug intake increased, the salivary pH decreased.
Regarding the measurement of the Total Sugar content of the drugs, it was done using Fehling method .Using this method comes in accordance with38,39,11.Using Fehling method because it is a very reliable method used since the 1800s to determine the amount of glucose.
The results of this study showed that both drugs(Apidone and Aironyl) are acidic. These results are matching with the values reported by many authors who investigated pediatric liquid medicaments (PLMs)22,11.
The total sugar content of Apidone is much higher than that of Aironyl as the values are 17g% and 0.5g% respectively. These results are matching with the range of values reported by many authors measuring sugar content8, 39,22 ,11.
These results showed that Apidone and Aironyl are acidic and contain sugar in their content so; it supports our results of high caries experience and low salivary pH in asthmatics.
Conclusions:
Caries is more common in asthmatic children than in healthy children. Asthmatics have a lower salivary pH than healthy people.
Funding: There was no funding forthis research.
Conflict of interest: No Conflicts of interest.